KMID : 0931320160160010019
|
|
´ëÇÑ»óºÎÀ§Àå°ü.Ç︮ÄÚ¹ÚÅÍÇÐȸÁö 2016 Volume.16 No. 1 p.19 ~ p.25
|
|
Analysis of Natural History of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors and Factors Related to Tumor Growth Demonstrated by Endoscopic Ultrasonography
|
|
:Han You-Jin
:Kim Sung-Eun/:Park Moo-In/:Park Seun-Ja/:Moon Won/:Kim Jae-Hyun/:Seo Kwang-Il/:Kim Hyeon-Jin/:Jung Jin-Kyu
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Background/Aims: Small subepithelial tumors (SETs) are often found incidentally during esophagoduodenoscopy, and EUS is a useful tool for assessing SETs. This study aimed to evaluate the natural history of SETs and to clarify the predictive factors of growth using EUS.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated SETs less than 30 mm and identified the EUS features. A significant increase in SET size was defined as a lengthening of more than 25% of the longest diameter in the last follow-up EUS features compared with the initial study.
Results: A total of 99 patients with 105 upper gastrointestinal SETs were enrolled. The mean follow-up period for SETs was 22.8 months. Among the 105 SETs, 12 (11.4%) were significantly larger at follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that the presence of hypoechoic areas was associated with significant SET growth (P=0.021). In multivariate analysis, the presence of hypoechoic areas (OR, 8.96; 95% CI, 1.89¡42.54) and anechoic areas (OR, 7.85; 95% CI, 1.09¡56.37) were related with significant growth of SETs. Six of the 12 SETs showing significant growth were removed, and identified as gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Conclusions: Majority of small SETs showed no significant increase during follow-up. Presence of hypoechoic areas and anechoic areas were associated with SET growth. Therefore, small SETs with hypoechoic area or anechoic area may be considered for regular follow-up in the clinical field.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Subepithelial tumors, Endoscopic ultrasonography, Natural history
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|